RegDossier covers EU regulatory compliance in English for the people who have to act on it, and for the firms they hire when they cannot do it alone. Free tools that run the thresholds, trackers that carry the dates, and a directory of the consultancies and auditors who do this work across the EU.
Eight Frameworks Land on One Person Who Already Has a Job
CSRD, NIS2, the AI Act, DORA, CBAM, the CRA, GDPR enforcement and EUDR. Each arrives with its own scope test, its own transposition timetable and its own penalty ceiling, and the AI Act alone has moved its dates twice. Reading the texts is not the hard part. Working out which paragraphs reach a 200-person company in your sector, and by which date, is where the fortnight goes.
Then Comes the Second Problem, Which Nobody Solves
Being in scope is rarely where people get stuck. Finding the right firm to close the gap is. The specialists who do this work sit on hundreds of separate websites, in twenty-seven countries, with no way to see them side by side. A compliance officer looking for a NIS2 gap assessment in a country she does not operate in has no list to work from and no way to tell a boutique from a badge.
The provider directory is that list. Filter by regulation, country, service type and the size of client a firm takes. Every entry is checked against the firm’s own service page before it goes in, and each one shows when that check happened.
Listing Is Free, and Nobody Buys Their Way In
A firm appears because it does the work and says so on its own website. There is no fee to be included and no fee to stay. Where a listing is promoted, the listing itself says so, in plain words, on the page. A directory where you cannot tell the difference is worth nothing to the person reading it, which makes it worth nothing to the firms in it either.
Nothing here is a recommendation. Inclusion means the firm exists, works in this area, and had a working page describing that service on the date we checked. It does not mean we vouch for the work. If your firm should be listed, or something about your entry is wrong, write to info@regdossier.eu.
Dates, Thresholds and Penalty Ceilings, Each Next to Its Source
The tools map thresholds straight from the regulatory text to your situation, and every calculation cites the article it comes from. The deadline tracker carries every date we have covered, marked where it still depends on publication in the Official Journal. The enforcement tracker carries confirmed fines and actions, each linked to the authority that issued it. Every entry shows when it was last checked, because on this subject a figure without a date is not worth much.
Written With AI, and Every Claim Is Linked So You Can Check It
Following eight frameworks across twenty-seven member states is a team’s work, and RegDossier does it with AI reading primary sources. That is stated on every page, and it is the reason the source link sits next to the claim rather than at the bottom. Where our text and the official published text differ, the official text governs. The full method, including what it does not cover, is on the How we work page. Read that before you rely on anything here.
We Are a Publication, Not a Consultancy
No law firm behind it, no legal advice, no compliance software to sell you and nothing to upsell you into. Sponsorships and affiliate links appear where they appear and say so on the page.
Corrections
If something here is wrong, send it to info@regdossier.eu. The fix carries a note saying what changed and when, including on pages old enough that nobody would go back and check.